And here is the evidence of that…
The double slit experiment was first performed by Thomas Young in 1801, as a demonstration of the wave nature of light. He used a coherent light source, such as sunlight or a candle, and passed it through a narrow slit in a card.
Then he placed another card with two parallel slits close to the first one, and observed the light pattern on a screen behind the second card.
He expected to see two bright spots on the screen, corresponding to the two slits, but instead he saw a series of bright and dark fringes, called an interference pattern.
This meant that the light waves passing through the two slits interfered with each other, creating regions of constructive and destructive interference.
This was evidence that light was not made of particles, as Isaac Newton had proposed, but of waves, as Christiaan Huygens had suggested.
However, with the development of quantum mechanics in the early 20th century, it was discovered that light could also behave like particles, called photons.
In 1905, Albert Einstein explained the photoelectric effect by assuming that light was composed of discrete packets of energy that could knock electrons out of metals.
In 1924, Louis de Broglie proposed that matter could also have wave properties, and derived a relation between the wavelength and momentum of any particle.
In 1927, Clinton Davisson and Lester Germer, and independently George Thomson and Alexander Reid, confirmed this hypothesis by showing that electrons could produce interference patterns when scattered by crystals.
Later, it was shown that atoms and molecules could also exhibit wave-particle duality.
The double slit experiment was then repeated with single photons or electrons, one at a time. Surprisingly, even when only one particle was sent through the slits at a time, an interference pattern still emerged on the screen after many repetitions.
This meant that each particle somehow interfered with itself, as if it went through both slits at once. However, if detectors were placed at the slits to observe which slit each particle passed through, the interference pattern disappeared.
This showed that the act of measurement affected the outcome of the experiment, and that the particle’s behavior depended on whether it was observed or not.
This phenomenon is known as quantum superposition and collapse, and it implies that quantum systems exist in a state of uncertainty until they are measured.
The experiment has profound implications for our understanding of reality and the nature of observation. It challenges our classical intuition and forces us to accept that reality is not deterministic but probabilistic at the quantum level.
Yours,
Dr Churchill
PS:
And that is where we come to rest today — until tomorrow’s Physics becomes today’s Metaphysics…
